Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Claude Opus 4.8 (Anthropic) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (OpenAI), compared on price, context, speed and Arabic support. Both run on thalam through one OpenAI-compatible API, so you can switch between them with a single model id change. At a glance, GPT-5.6 Luna is the cheaper option and GPT-5.6 Luna is rated faster.

Specs side by side

SpecClaude Opus 4.8GPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
TypeTextText
Context window1M1M
Max output128K128K
Input price$5.00 / 1M$0.20 / 1M
Output price$25.00 / 1M$1.20 / 1M
SpeedMediumFast
Arabic supportStrongStrong

Which should you choose?

Choose Claude Opus 4.8 if…
  • Anthropic's newest frontier model. Highest capability for complex reasoning, long-form, and agentic tasks
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
  • Lower cost, about 25× cheaper ($0.20 / 1M)
  • Rated faster (Fast) for latency-sensitive workloads
Run both Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Luna on one API

One OpenAI-compatible endpoint, one bill. Switch between them with a single model id change, pay per use, credits never expire.

Related comparisons

FAQ

What's the difference between Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Luna?

GPT-5.6 Luna costs less ($0.20 / 1M vs $5.00 / 1M); GPT-5.6 Luna is rated faster. Both are available on thalam behind one OpenAI-compatible API.

Is Claude Opus 4.8 or GPT-5.6 Luna cheaper?

GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper on input ($0.20 / 1M vs $5.00 / 1M). On thalam you pay per use, so you can route cheap-by-default and fall back to the other only when needed.

Can I use both Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6 Luna with one API key?

Yes. thalam is OpenAI-compatible, so both models are reachable through the same endpoint. Switching between them is a one-line model id change, no code rewrite.