LLM alternatives
One key. Every leading AI model.
GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.8, DeepSeek V4, Qwen, Kimi, Llama and 80+ others, through one OpenAI-compatible gateway. Pay per token, no lock-in.
One key. Every leading model.
You’re not trading your model for a lesser one, you’re adding everything next to it. Route the best model per task, no second account.
Why route through a gateway
No single-provider lock-in
If a model degrades or rate-limits, switch in one line, no re-integration.
The right model per job
Frontier reasoning, long context, cheap high-volume: all reachable on one key.
One account, one bill
Pay per token across every provider from a single balance, no contract per provider.
GCC-native infrastructure
Built in the region, for the teams building here, with local support.
Keep the model you use. Add the rest.
Whatever you run today: GPT, Claude, DeepSeek, runs on thalam unchanged. The difference is everything that sits next to it on the same key, one string away.
One line. Really.
Change base_url and your API key. Every OpenAI SDK works unchanged.
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
base_url="https://api.thalam.ai/v1", # the only change
api_key="tl-live-...", # your Thalam key
)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
model="anthropic/claude-opus-4.8",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)Frequently asked
Can I keep the models I use today?
Yes: GPT, Claude, DeepSeek and 80+ others all live on one key.
Is thalam a drop-in replacement for the OpenAI API?
Yes: it’s OpenAI-compatible. Change the base URL and your API key; everything else stays the same.
Do I have to rewrite my code?
No. Every OpenAI SDK and framework: LangChain, LlamaIndex, Instructor, works unchanged.
How is billing different?
One account, one bill, pay per token across every model, no separate contract per provider.
Is there any lock-in?
No: it’s the standard OpenAI interface. You can point your code elsewhere any time.
One key. Every model.
Get an API key in under a minute. Pay as you go: top up from $1.